Hi, This is my ARP blog and I would like present it to you in the order as below:

Featured

Acknowledgment: This structure is inspired from template shared by one of my tutor @Lindsay (https://actionresearchproject.myblog.arts.ac.uk/) with slight reordering and unit expectations:

  • My Research Question
  • My Project focus
  • My Positionality
  • Rationale
  • Participant Facing documents
  • What now?:Action plan: Activity plan/brief
  • Ethics
  • Feedback from Tutorials
  • Research Methods
  • Project Findings
  • My Reflections around Project Findings
  • What next?: Action Plan: My proposal
  • Pilot action completed: Datathon (Shared activity)
  • References
  • Presentations
  • Citation Blog

Citation Activity- Workshop 2 – Citation readings 1-5

“Cite black women- Christen Smith”

“We have really strong evidence that women are undercited and that people of colour are undercited.”- Diana Kwon

I read this article provided in moodle as part of the Citation Reading activity based on which is what I write down my thoughts, reflections and action.

Academic citation systems form the backbone of scholarly work, designed to acknowledge prior knowledge and credit past contributions. However, these systems are far from impartial or purely functional. They often privilege certain voices—predominantly those of white, male scholars—while marginalizing perspectives that challenge dominant norms. This exclusionary trend perpetuates what theorists like bell hooks have termed a “white heteromasculine hegemony,” which narrows the diversity of thought within academic discourse.

  • Courtesy: (Kwon, D., 2022)

Scholars such as Sarah Ahmed and Patricia Hill Collins have critiqued these entrenched systems, advocating for citation practices that honor marginalized voices. Ahmed argues that citation is not a neutral act but rather a political one, and thus researchers have a responsibility to disrupt traditional hierarchies. Similarly, Collins calls for a greater inclusion of feminist and Black feminist perspectives to resist the reproduction of oppressive structures. Such conscientious citation practices enrich the academic landscape, fostering dialogue and collaboration across diverse intellectual traditions.

Another though which struck was, when I read these articles, I used to think why people coin new words like eg: “white heteromasculine hegemony “ by Bell hooks and others instead of using the existing words and make people understand what it really means as against the mindsets or set agenda from people. For example, disabled (handicapped), Intersectionality (Multiple discrimination) etc., Also will a tag line in a T-shirt change people thoughts?

But yes, it made an impact when these black women said “Cite Black Women” as in the snapshot below:

Initially I used to question the need for these linguistic innovations, viewing them as unnecessary complications to existing terminology. However, upon engaging with the critical works of scholars and activists, it becomes clear to me that these new terms are essential tools for dismantling outdated paradigms and promoting equity. Language, like citation, is not neutral. The words we choose either reinforce or resist existing power structures.

I also attended a “Ant-Racism development workshop” which forms part of Anti Racism Action Plan on 12th December 2024. In which we were asked to share about instances of racism, when I said citation, people were quite surprised to know how this can be a form of racism, but when I explained that this is not something intentionally all the time, but there is bias to cite papers of more whites than skin of colour. Citations often privilege established voices.

My action (minimalistic as much as I can to begin with):

Recently I was reviewer for a research article from China, somehow most of the references are from Chinese authors, in fact after I read the article and attended our ARP tutorial on citation, I suggested them to include experts all around the globe to be versatile and a more inclusive knowledge production.

Reference

Kwon, D., 2022. The rise of citational justice: how scholars are making references fairer. Nature News Feature, 22 March. [Correction published 6 April 2022]. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00787-4 [Accessed 3 January 2025].

References

Ahmed, K.A., Sharif, N., and Ahmad, N. (2017) ‘Factors Influencing Students’ Career Choices: Empirical Evidence from Business Students’, Journal of Southeast Asian Research, Available at: https://doi.org/10.5171/2017.718849

Azhenov, A., Kudysheva, A., Fominykh, N. and Tulekova, G. (2023) ‘Career decision-making readiness among students in the system of higher education: career course intervention’, Frontiers in Education, vol.8, Available at:10.3389/feduc.2023.1097993

Abraha, M., Dagnew, A. and Seifu, A. (2022) ‘Influences of teacher’s characteristics on their gender-responsive pedagogy practices: The case of general secondary schools of North Wollo’, Journal of Education, 203(4), pp. 835–842

Daghigh, A., Daghigh, V., Niazi, M. and Morse, D.T., (2021) ‘Undergraduate student’s perceptions of professors concerning academic rules and relations: Does sex matter?’, Journal of Education, 201(1), pp.28-33.

Dunn, B. (2024), ‘Young people show declining aspirations in STEM – is climate change the answer?’ Available at:  https://www.stem.org.uk/all-news/young-people-show-declining-aspirations

Fernandez, D. (2022) ‘A Study on Factors affecting the Career Choice of Students in Higher Education Institutions in Sultanate of Oman’, International Academic Journal of Education and Literature, 3(2), pp. 43–55.

Hadiyati, M. and Astuti, B. (2023) ‘Student careers: What factors influence career choice?’, Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 7, pp. 608–614.

Islam, A. (2019), ‘Improving Educational Quality Through Curriculum Development: An Empirical Investigation Using Stakeholder Feedback Data’, Journal of Education, 199(2), pp.69-82. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057419848370

Li, C. and Zeng, W. (2017) ‘On the Herd Behaviour of University Students Based on the Studies of Social Psychology’, Proceedings of the 2017 4th International Conference on Education, Management and Computing Technology (ICEMCT 2017), pp. 368–372. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2991/icemct-17.2017.83 (Accessed 29 Dec. 2024]

Mansour, N. (2024) ‘Exploring the impact of social, cultural, and science factors on students’ STEM career preferences’, Research in Science Education. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10210-4 [Accessed 2 Jan. 2025]

Pacheco Salles, F.L., Maciel Ferreira, D., Torres dos Santos Lopes, D. and Bull Loose, M.E. (2020) ‘Evaluation of the satisfaction of undergraduate students through the structural equations modeling’, Journal of Education, 200(1), pp.23–31. Available at: 10.1177/0022057419864533

Skills for Care. (2024), Care Certificate Standards: Standard 4. [online] Available at: https://www.skillsforcare.org.uk/resources/documents/Developing-your-workforce/Care-Certificate/Care-Certificate-Standards/Standard-4.pdf [Accessed 31 Dec. 2024].

University of Exeter News Archive. Available at: https://news-archive.exeter.ac.uk/featurednews/title_426833_en.html [Accessed 21 December 2024]